https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9389
Howard Chu <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Howard Chu <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Simon Pichugin from comment #0) > Description: When signal-interrupted (by any signal, i.e. SIGRTMIN+1) while > in tls_read, libldap will stop the execution. > > It will be better to make libldap more robust because some applications may > use the signals in their watchdogs (i.e. SSSD). > Proposal: Add a retry action somewhere inside of ldap_install_tls which will > reinitiate the operation from the beginning (so it won't affect the security > aspect but it will increase reliability). There doesn't appear to be any safe/reliable/portable way to retry these operations. It would make more sense for the calling application to simply mask off signals before initiating a TLS session. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
