https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634
--- Comment #3 from Michael Ströder <[email protected]> --- 1. Even when storing <what> clauses into a list you could maintain a separate bit field which types are already defined and reject multiple <what> clauses of same type during config parsing. 2. You could also simply treat <what> clauses of same type with and-relation. This could be useful in some cases. E.g. define a cheap <what> DN clause for skipping an irrelevant ACL more early in most cases but ensuring to only fire after applying all potentially expensive checks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
