https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9888
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #6) > (In reply to Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>) > >> (In reply to Howard Chu from comment #4) > >> Also note that the OID is part of the index key, so reusing OIDs for > >> different attributes will absolutely corrupt indices. > > > > Hm, that's odd. One of my first conversations with you back at Stanford was > > when we hit an issue with AD that it stores knowledge of the attribute OIDs > > and > > OpenLDAP does not (back with OpenLDAP 2.1). > > AFAICT this changed with back-mdb. Zimbra was one of the earliest adopters of back-mdb and never hit this issue in OpenLDAP 2.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
