https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10333

          Issue ID: 10333
           Summary: Recurring crash in lmdb:mdb_page_alloc()
           Product: LMDB
           Version: 0.9.29
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: needs_review
          Severity: normal
          Priority: ---
         Component: liblmdb
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
  Target Milestone: ---

Full_Name: 
Version: 0.9.29
OS: Vendor built Linux based on Ubuntu kernel 4.14.173

mdb_page_alloc (SIGBUS)
Number of Events: 610

We have seen a recurring crash in lmdb:mdb_page_alloc() but only in the field
with our product.  One instance yielded a core in
which we confirmed the same stack back trace when examined.  It matches the
automated backtrace reports we received from field
deployments.  The lmdb is built from source at version 0.9.29, unchanged from
upstream.  The operating environment is an
embedded Linux appliance with Linux kernel at version "linux-4.14.173-aum-01"
and our own application that uses lmdb to store
certain data while transactions are in progress.  We build everything with gcc
7.3.0 and link with glibc version 2.27.  Unfortunately
no in-house reproduction has been possible, only a number of matching stack
traces from field reports of application crashes.
We are working on some system tests to see if can can cause a reproduction. 
This report is in hopes some others may have seen
a similar backtrace to help locate a bug.

(gdb) where
#0  mdb_page_alloc (num=num@entry=1, mp=mp@entry=0x7ffec216d120, mc=<optimized
out>) at mdb.c:2310
#1  0x00007fa2508c764e in mdb_page_new (mc=mc@entry=0x7ffec216d670,
flags=flags@entry=1, num=num@entry=1, mp=mp@entry=0x7ffec216d1d0) at mdb.c:7193
#2  0x00007fa2508c7a9b in mdb_page_split (mc=mc@entry=0x7ffec216d670,
newkey=newkey@entry=0x7ffec216da70, newdata=newdata@entry=0x7ffec216da50,
newpgno=newpgno@entry=18446744073709551615, nflags=0) at mdb.c:8649
#3  0x00007fa2508ca4ee in mdb_cursor_put (mc=0x7ffec216d670,
key=0x7ffec216da70, data=0x7ffec216da50, flags=<optimized out>) at mdb.c:6957
#4  0x00007fa2508cc26a in mdb_put (txn=0xb767020, dbi=3, key=0x7ffec216da70,
data=0x7ffec216da50, flags=0) at mdb.c:9045
#5  0x00007fa2520a69f4 in XXX_XXX_store::add (this=0x7fa25230ada0
<XXX_x509_validation_s::kv_store_h>, key=0x7ffec216dbc0
"\351\066\030\201\261\223\025\\q\006\204g:\274\241\330\377Ã ", keylen=20, 
    value=0x7ffec216db20 "\002", valuelen=19, flag=<optimized out>,
table=XXX_KV_STORE_TABLE_MAIN) at lib/XXX_kv_store.cpp:479
#6  0x00007fa2520a03fa in ?? ()
#7  0x00007ffec216dc60 in ?? ()
#8  0x00007ffec216dca8 in ?? ()
#9  0x00007ffec216dc60 in ?? ()
#10 0x00007fa2520a2990 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.

Reply via email to