https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10411
Howard Chu <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |INVALID Keywords|needs_review | --- Comment #4 from Howard Chu <[email protected]> --- (In reply to elecharny from comment #3) > I buy that. I was surprised that the other oppAttrs were created, but on a > second thought I can understand that recreating the structuralObjetclass > would potentially cost more than the gain of using the -s flag. > Up to me to use a proper set of data, as you said, generated by slapcat. > > You can close the ticket. > Thanks for your insight, Howard! In particular, the structuralObjectClass of an entry is computed during the schema checking, so we can't know what to set it to without schema checking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
