https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10424
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] --- Indeed. And actually that was the reason I was thinking it would be a good addition. My initial request was not exactly clear in this respect when I mentioned the possibility to store the contextCSN on a subentry, as it's currently supported, but the meat in this proposal is elsewhere, as you said. Thanks for the heads up! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
