https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10424

--- Comment #4 from [email protected] ---
Indeed.

And actually that was the reason I was thinking it would be a good addition.

My initial request was not exactly clear in this respect when I mentioned the
possibility to store the contextCSN on a subentry, as it's currently supported,
but the meat in this proposal is elsewhere, as you said.

Thanks for the heads up!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.

Reply via email to