At 07:37 PM 7/19/2005, Howard Chu wrote: >Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: >>At 09:29 AM 7/19/2005, luca regini wrote: >> >>>Actually the real reason is that the dsw has references to dsp files that >>>doesn't exist in the package. How could it be??? I wonder if someone has >>>ever built the software using this .dsw. I must build it under windows, so >>>i'll try to build it myself and then i'll provide back a correct dsw file. >>>Hope to find some help if things go wrong. >> >>I think the preferred way of building under Windows 32 is to >>use MINGW32. See the FAQ for details. >> >And if you're interested in MSVC support in the future, it may be worthwhile >to investigate enhancing the current Makefiles to work with the MSVC >commandline tools. I find the IDE project/workspace management to be too >cumbersome. (Of course, I don't see any compelling need to use MSVC here, so >MSVC compatibility for the Makefiles isn't an urgent priority.)
I agree. The dsw/dsp files should be axed (in HEAD and releases). Kurt >-- > -- Howard Chu > Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc > OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/
