[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > init.c 1.111 -> 1.112 > more (in)sanity stuff
I haven't looked closely, but I imagine cleaner fix would be to move parts of monitor_back_db_destroy (bi->bi_db_destroy) to bi->bi_destroy. Or maybe parts of monitor_back_initialize to monitor_back_db_init (bi->bi_db_init) - is there any need to set up back-montor if it is not used? BTW, I expect the structs in monitor_back_initialize should be static and maybe const. -- Hallvard
