At 12:24 PM 11/8/2005, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >Why not using ><http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/icu/index.jsp> ? > >if available, instead of the built-in liblunicode?
I think we should consider depending on ICU for our Unicode requirements (and axing liblunicode). We need to add support for SASLprep and LDAPprep, and ICU seems like a good fit. Kurt
