At 12:05 PM 1/12/2006, Howard Chu wrote: >That sounds OK. Currently back-monitor exposes the slapd version string;
a trimmed version. I find slapd -V more helpful as it says who build slapd and from where. >we should add whatever version strings are available for any other libraries >we know about (OpenSSL and SASL come to mind as frontend libraries). It would be nice to publish both the header and library version information, where available. >The database backends (bdb/hdb, ldbm) should register a version string for >their underlying database library, and modules in general should register a >module version string. > >I'm reluctant to put exhaustive build environment info into back-monitor. Lots >of that information can be easily determined after the fact with common tools >like nm, strings, ldd, etc., so it doesn't seem worth the effort to capture >that info explicitly. I concur. Kurt
