Howard Chu wrote: > Eric Irrgang wrote: >> Since >> 1) the behavior is different >> 2) the slapd.conf to cn=config conversion sucks in the relevant >> information anyway >> and >> 3) use of includes is inappropriate under cn=config >> is it maybe time for the slap* tools stop creating cn=Includes? > > The conversion creates them to document their existence. In fact after a > conversion, when slapd starts up from a slapd.d, the cn=Include records > are ignored.
Howard, I also think this is confusing. I'd propose to drop cn=Includes completely. There is no point to document their existence since, as you explained, the order is not preserved. Ciao, Michael.
