No comments on this? So I guess this means I can just go ahead and submit the patch to HEAD for testing?
On Monday 04 June 2007 17:13, Ralf Haferkamp wrote: > Hello, > > slightly related to the above ITS, I have found another issue. I am not > sure though if this is a bug or if the behaviour is intended. I have a > setup here were the pcache and rwm-overlay is used on top of back-ldap. > rwm is used to rewrite some Attributetypes unknown to the Schema of the > local server to Attributetypes that are defined in the local server. As the > attribute values from unknown attribute types cannot be normalized by the > proxy, I am wondering if rwm should normalize them during the Mapping > process? Otherwise the Values will endup un-normalized in the cache > database, and I get incomplete results when requests are answered from the > cache. > > I have a patch ready for this but I was wondering if the normalization step > is left out by intention and wanted to ask before commiting my patch. -- Ralf
