<quote who="Howard Chu"> > Gavin Henry wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> For the backend type for all the replication examples I'm doing just >> now, >> should we use bdb or hdb? >> >> I notice that in slapd.conf.default we are using bdb. > > I'm in no hurry to deprecate back-bdb, and back-hdb's initial performance > is > heavily dependent on priming its IDL cache. It's a tossup - back-bdb with > no > subtree renames but less cache sensitivity, or back-hdb with full > directory > semantics and more cache sensitivity. I suspect we'll be carrying both for > a > long time, because of this tradeoff.
Understood. I'll stick with back-bdb for the examples, unless the backend is required to be changed for a specific example. Thanks. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Gavin. >> > > > -- > -- Howard Chu > Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ >
