Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along
with this
what's its status?
I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by
accesslog; I'm working at it) should have "X-ORDERED 'VALUES'", as
ordering __might__ matter (RFC 4511 is not quite definitive on the subject:
Additionally, unless order-dependent semantics are given in a
specification, the order of a combination of controls in the SEQUENCE
is ignored.
but at least it leaves room for specifying order-based semantics).
Nevermind, I've found a spec with X-ORDERED...
Right, as documented here
http://www.highlandsun.com/hyc/drafts/draft-chu-ldap-logschema-xx.html
they are intended to be Ordered.
Unfortunately the dependency on the xordered spec has kind of held up
publishing of the logschema spec, since the xordered spec still needs a lot of
corrections.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
