On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on
an idea
of Steve:
Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in
OpenLDAP's TODO.
In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in
slapd.conf
and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for
informational
purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in
slapd.conf.
Opinions?
One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules...
(server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).
So you're voting against the approach suggested above?
No. Above you say "without enforcing them". I suggest "with
enforcing them",
as ditContentRules are (if instantiated).
-- Kurt
