On Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2008, Michael Ströder wrote: > Ralf Haferkamp wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2008, Michael Ströder wrote: > >> Ralf Haferkamp wrote: > >>>> For 1. I usually ask my customers how they are going to > >>>> implement the change management. After some discussion we > >>>> usually end up with text-based config managed with version > >>>> control. Something simple and handy. :-) > >>> > >>> Yes, I guess that this works pretty well when you deploy OpenLDAP > >>> (or basically any other software) at a single customer. It gets > >>> harder when you ship OpenLDAP as a part of a product, > >> > >> I already imagined what your aim is. ;-) > > > > Of course my aim is somewhat focused on what I am getting paid for, > > whose isn't? :) > Yes, this was not meant as offense. I didn't take it as an offense. But thanks for clarifying ;-)
> > But additionally to that I was trying to find out if > > there is a general interest among the OpenLDAP Developers to have > > some kind of management tools/api. > > I consider the LDAP C API to be inspired by what is sent/received > over the wire. I'd expect such a higher-level management API to be > inspired by certain management use-cases. So which use-cases do you > have in mind? I listed some in my last reply to Ando. -- Ralf
