Quanah Gibson-Mount writes: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay. So do we want this in for 2.4.9?
Since it's an incompatible change I'd rather see it early in the release cycle. Even if the incompatibility is unlikely to hit many users. Provided someone *tests* it on Windows, using back-ldif as a primary backend with illegal filename characters in the DNs. I can't. -- Hallvard
