Howard Chu wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
The consumer seems to be OK in general - it ignores the NEW_COOKIE if it's
equal to or older than its current ctxcsn. However, I've now seen another case
where a consumer receives the NEW_COOKIE message from one provider before it
has received the real update from any providers. So again, when the real
update arrives, it is ignored.
Appears to be the ITS#5973 patch, not 5972.
Reverting the syncrepl part of the ITS#5973 patch appears to let test050 pass
for me now. But looking at the logs, there are a lot of NEW_COOKIE messages
being sent (and there ought to be none in this scenario). Also, I'm seeing a
lot of entries propagated without any CSN in the sync cookie. The results look
correct, but there's still something flaky here.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
