Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: > access control pseudo-attributes 'entry'/'children' interfere with > attributeType ( <oid> NAME <'entry' or 'children'> ... ). > IIRC an old access control internet-draft used [entry] and [children] > instead. Should we move to rename them that way?
I always wondered how conflicts were to be avoided for such pseudo-attributes... In web2ldap I usually avoid collisions by using additions to names/identifiers which are not compliant to an existing standard and are sorted out by web2ldap internally. So I'd propose something like _entry_ and _children_ or similar. Ciao, Michael.
