Hi, Le Ven 29 mai 2009 16:11, Howard Chu a écrit : > Rein Tollevik wrote: >> Howard Chu wrote: >>> Howard Chu wrote: >>>> Since there is currently no support at all, I think it's important to >>>> get >>>> something usable first, and worry about those other cases later. >>> >>> The other alternative, which is much simpler to implement, is just to >>> add a suffixmassage/rewrite keyword to the syncrepl config, allowing it >>> to pull from a particular remote base and map it to the local base. >>> Then >>> it's up to the sysadmin to create a complete cn=config hierarchy >>> somewhere else on the master server and let the slaves pick it up. That >>> would address all of the issues of differentiation, at the cost of a >>> little bit of redundancy on the master. >> >> I'm not too fond of the proposed olcServerMatch, it appears to me to >> create a cluttered config database that requires you to match these >> attribute values to see the currently active configuration. Should it >> be added though, then I would prefer it to be defined as range(s) of >> serverIDs rather than a pattern to match. Regexp matching of integer >> ranges is always awkward.. > > Yes, I agree, it would make things cluttered and the complexity could > easily > get out of hand. In retrospect I'm not so fond of the idea.
Wouldn't it be possible to simply extend the attribute name to make it match a server? Eg: olcAccess;server1: ... olcAccess;server2: ... That would be IMHO more clear than any related regexp-attribute. Regards, Raphaël Ouazana.
