I'd say delete it unless of historical value (e.g., UMich-related) ... can't see why anyone would need to use it these days.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>wrote: > --On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry < > ghe...@suretecsystems.com> wrote: > > >> ----- "Michael Ströder" <mich...@stroeder.com> wrote: >> >> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >>> > In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and >>> earlier) >>> > information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be >>> able to >>> > archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use. >>> > Thoughts on how best to achieve this? >>> >>> Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are >>> not of >>> such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain >>> an archive. >>> >>> Ciao, Michael. >>> >> >> It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted. >> > > Anyone else have an opinion? > > --Quanah > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Engineer > Zimbra, Inc > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration > >
