masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote:
pcache has been working fine without explicit support of these so far, and
they're not critical to the current work. I'm not opposed to someone
adding
these later, but I don't have time for them right now.
Please, consider it food for thoughts.
Certainly. I think it would be more interesting to use them in the syncrepl
code first, though. The syncrepl engine is intended to work with other
mechanisms after all; we could start by fleshing out the retro-changelog
consumer code. (At this point I think all that's needed is to omit the
requirement of a syncrepl control on each response.)
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
