> Do you have a use case for this? I'm implementing add-if-not-present to > ease the implementation of the version number overlay, so I could > implement softdel as well. > > I think all of these could make sense also protocol-wise (including > softadd), but I'm not in the mood right now to start the formalization > process, so I'd leave it to a later time.
Yes. I've had to implement this exact feature in application code before (via search + conditional mod). It appears frequently in middleware stuff when you're merging data from multiple upstream account sources and a registry into LDAP. The softdel case appears less often than softadd, but is extremely useful when trying to cleanup mistakes. More concretely, middleware performing a multi-db reconciliation sweep can use it to assert implied constraints on each object. For example, if some event happens, the entry must now have attr1=val1, and must not have attr2=val2, but might already be in that situation. This allows for more cases of idempotent atomic changes without needing transactions. A number of overlays will need to watch for this as it is particularly relevant for groups (memberOf, refint, etc). Matthew Backes Symas Corporation mbac...@symas.com
