On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> Kurt Zeilenga writes:
>> I'm not sure why his merge was needed. Likely I goofed. I think it
>> was a no-op.
>
> Ah. Well, we'll have more glitches I'm sure.
>
> 'gitk --all' or 'git log --graph' shows you did 'Update guide
> Copyright/License handling' in one branch and 'Update configure' +
> Update for git' in another. I.e. didn't pull the first before
> committing/pushing the second.
Shouldn't that have been rejected by the hooks:
[receive]
denyNonFastForwards = true
denyDeletes = true
If something requires a merge, wouldn't that be a non-fast-forward push?
