William King wrote: > If stable is not dropped, at least have a page for known 'bad problems' for > the releases. This would help to inform users why they would or would not want > a particular release.
That's an even more blurry approach than the existing "stable" tag. My rule is: It's better to have no information than incomplete/outdated/errornous information. Ciao, Michael. > On 11/09/2011 11:19 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> --On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:27 PM +0100 Michael Ströder >> <mich...@stroeder.com> wrote: >> >>> => My suggestion: Simply drop "stable" completely and list only the >>> releases with version number without further qualification. Today most >>> people can deal with version numbers quite well. >> >> I fairly well agree. OpenLDAP 2.4.23 has a number of serious problems. >> OpenLDAP 2.4.26 is much more "stable". I think it is unfortunate that >> 2.4.23 is still listed as the "stable" release on the downloads page. There >> may still yet be bugs in 2.4.26, but it is a vast improvement over 2.4.23, >> 2.4.24, or 2.4.25. >> >> --Quanah
