On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Howard Chu <h...@symas.com> wrote:
>> ok... what's the number of writes being carried out in each >> transaction? the original scenario in which i saw the issue was when >> there was one (!!). the design at the time was not optimised for >> batches of reads followed by batches of writes. > > > This is 1 write per txn. already? oh ok so that's hammering the machine rather a lot, then :) ok let me do some exploring this end, see if i can come up with something that replicates the dreadful performance. l.
