On 7/11/19 6:43 PM, Howard Chu wrote: > Michael Ströder wrote: >> Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have >> NO-USER-MODIFICATION. >> >> memberof.c contains a commented line: >> /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */ >> >> But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible >> maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added. >> >> Any objections against adding it? > > ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to > test it out though.
Hmm, the git log is pretty terse. This commit after intial import only added comments: ------------------------ snip ------------------------ commit e33abd467c526a740a10f77e84ccc78d7b18e6d7 Author: Pierangelo Masarati <a...@openldap.org> Date: Sat Aug 25 16:02:43 2007 +0000 needs work: memberOf should not be replicated ------------------------ snip ------------------------ There's no reasoning why 'memberOf' should not be replicated. IMHO it should be replicated to avoid the effects described in ITS#8613 [1]. Can anyone shed some light on this? Ciao, Michael. [1] https://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=8613