[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Steve had an ugly hack to work around this by linking the meta backend > against the bdb backend. Doing that isn't the ugly part -- that's > actually formally correct and really is what libtool should be doing in > the first place. The ugly part is that libtool *really* doesn't like > linking against something that doesn't start with lib*.
Sorry, I didn't double-check the original report and got this confused. I believe it's back-ldap that back-meta has a dependency on, not back-bdb. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
