[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > You might consider suggesting to PADL that they contribute pam/nss_ldap > to the OpenLDAP Project, if you want us to take an active role in > solving this. Until then, the discussion just doesn't belong here on the > OpenLDAP ITS. I'll note that I've described the solution Symas uses in > our commercial distribution of pam/nss-ldap on the pam/nss-ldap mailing > lists in the past. Our package has none of these issues. > > Hint: since dynamic linker dependencies are causing the conflict, the > solution is not to rely on the dynamic linker. In this particular case, > using the dynamic linker introduces a security vulnerability anyway.
Understood. Thank you very much for the help that you've provided. We'll try to find a solution that won't make you hate us. :) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
