I wrote: > Assuming the acl call should be there, one simple fix could be to > introduce a 'li_wlock' mutex, lock it early on LDAP update operations, > and delay locking li_rdwr until the operation is about to update > the database.
That does affect scheduling: Incoming read operations bypass pending write operations that are waiting for another write operation. (Since write but not read operations lock li_wlock before li_rdwr.) Looks acceptable to me, back-ldif doesn't exist for max performance. -- Hallvard
