[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> "An LDAP server MUST act in accordance with the X.500 (1993) series" >> Except when it doesn't. Like the various implications of sending text >> instead of ASN.1 and numeric OIDs. > That's irrelevant. The service model and the on-the-wire encoding are > two completely different things.
That's not what I meant, but in any case, this discussion seems to be going nowhere fast as far as resolving this ITS is concerned. I've committed the referral_rewrite fix I suggested and removed default_referral. Left back-ldif alone for now, can take it with ITS#5408. Didn't mark it "test" yet, I don't know if changes like 'reject add of ref attr with DN' or whatever you think should be done should go in this ITS or another one. -- Hallvard
