On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does this help? From my fiddling with ITS#5340 (REP_ENTRY_MODIFIABLE). > I do not understand syncprov's handling of REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE though. > (For one thing it seems to assume that REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE is set if > and only if rs.sr_entry->e_private != NULL. Which is possibly true with > back-bdb but seems a shaky assumption in general.)
I have found out how to reliably reproduce this bug in our master server, and it definitely involves syncprov. I'm now working on reproducing it in a minimalistic test configuration, I'll try your patch there and report back. Rein
