Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> OK, reverted the trylock (which was put there in rev 1.376). I >> unfortunately don't remember what prompted that commit; certainly >> there was no ITS associated with it. > > It was committed 9 minutes before this message: > http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/msg00032.html > Thanks for that reference. test050 is fine right now; I think rev 1.381 was the more correct fix for that problem.
-- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
