On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 08:34 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Marian Eichholz > Version: HEAD-20080411 > OS: Linux > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (194.97.7.65) > > > When I made a consistency check with our two syncrepl consumers, I found > several > irritating differences. > > After the initial refresh cycle, the DNs were complete. But when the consumers > got all new objects after, they now have objects that were deleted on the > provider in the meantime. Unfortunately I cannot tell when that happened to a > specific DN. > The set of undeleted objects is not identically on the two consumers. > So I guess that it is not a problem with the data itself. > > So the consumers are corrupted now. > > Both consumers suffer from hanging replication sessions. This is why we > switched > from 2.4.8 to HEAD (11.4.2008, see ITS 5463). They were stopped and restarted > repeatedly, of course. The daemons have never been killed. So the DBD backend > SHOULD be OK. > > Any idea how to find such events in the LOCAL4-Log? I did not apply "any" as > loglevel for predictable performance issues and so liked to keep the entries > to > a reasonable volume. > > Thank You very much for any idea. > > Yours sincerely - Marian Eichholz (freenet AG) > >
Hi Marion. I saw both those problems with 2.4.8. But they both seem to have been fixed in the RE24 cvs tag as of 14/04/08. I have an arrangement of syncrepl servers based on that release that has been running fine for a few days now with about 10 connections per second on the consumers. Martin. -- -- Dr Martin Evans, Computing Services, Queen Mary
