----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --On Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:12 PM +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The ITS is polluted by issues opened, considered by developers, and > > pending feedback since ever. I suggest the ITS automatically > closes > > issues not fed back after a reasonable amount of time. Closed > issues can > > always be re-opened if issueers wake up and respond. > > > The problem I see with this is we have a number of ITS' that are open > > because the work was partially done, but there is work remaining to be > > done, and that needs to be tracked. I'm not sure if "Open" is the > best > state, but they definitely shouldn't be "closed" either. > > I feel what we really need is a much improved bug tracking system > where we > can do things like assign target releases to bugs, keywords, and have > > better-tuned states.
http://www.mantisbt.org/ ? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/
