Re: (ITS#5777) slapd should reject BindRequest with 'name' when SASL bind is sent

[Kurt]

On Oct 29, 2008, at 2:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I wonder whether it would be worth that slapd rejects a SASL bind  
> request with
> BindRequest.name set (normally used for simple bind) returning a  
> protocolError
> error code.

RFC 4513:
    Clients sending a BindRequest message with the sasl choice selected
    SHOULD send a zero-length value in the name field.  Servers  
receiving
    a BindRequest message with the sasl choice selected SHALL ignore any
    value in the name field.

So, no.

-- Kurt