[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --On Saturday, November 29, 2008 5:32 AM +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> IIRC, this also broke ACI's in RE2.4, and that still needs fixing as >>> well. >> Did it? Where is the report about that? > > Can't find it atm, but I remember someone writing in about ACI's being > broken in HEAD right now, and I believe it was related to this change. > RE2.4 was a typo on my part, since this isn't in RE24 right now.
Yes (I think it was Hallvard). ACIs broke since acl_string_expand() changed prototype, but the number of args was the same, and compiling succeeded with a warning (which I didn't notice, btw). To make it worse, test041 did not fail (apparently, it makes no use of string expansion). Now it's fixed; I'd say hacked, since I did not want to change the API of dynacl, yet. Changing the API should not be a big deal, given the presumably limited number of custom dynacl 'round. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------
