[email protected] wrote: > --On Saturday, January 17, 2009 2:38 AM +0000 [email protected] wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:14:01PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >>> --On Saturday, January 17, 2009 2:08 AM +0000 [email protected] wrote: >>>> RE24 as of 13 January 2009 is still crashing, sometimes due to an >>>> assertion failure and sometimes due to a segfault when manipulating the >>>> back-bdb cache. >>> Well, I'm not sure I'd use RE24 CVS right now. There's a lot of pending >>> fixes that I'll be doing soon to go into it. >> So your recommendation would be... to revert to 2.4.13 and wait for these >> fixes to land in RE24 to see if they fix the back-bdb cache-related >> segfaults I'm reporting in this ITS? > > I'm just warning that current RE24 is not expected to be at all stable.
I vaguely remember a discussion about deprecating back-bdb in favor of back-hdb anyway. Ciao, Michael.
