[please reply to the ITS, otherwise issues can't be tracked] Brett @Google wrote: > HI Ando, > > Do you know if the fix for ITS#5760 (says fixed for RE24 and HEAD) make it > into RE24 in time for the 2.4.13 release ?
apparently, yes. > If so, i can still see the behaviour here with 2.4.13, i can see operational > attributes, but non non-operational attributes, when mapping both > objectclass and attribute.. > > Bug seems to be focused on using of *, rather than an explicit list of > non-operational attrs which works, ie : > > I can search for attributes with * ( get all non-operational attributes ) > and don't get any non-operational attributes, whereas explicitly adding any > non-operational attribute will result i a search returning the named values, > which is allowable via the objectclass maps. > > seems to work the same (omitting non-oprational attrs), even if i dont > specufy the objectclass rwm maps. Not sure I understand. Can you post simple (both working and not working) examples? p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: [email protected] -----------------------------------
