[email protected] wrote: > >> No. Replication is supposed to work regardless of mode, refreshOnly / >> refreshAndPersist should yield identical results. > ... > >> There is still a bug here. > > You mean that the fact that N-way Multi-master doesn't replicate deletes > properly when using "refreshOnly" is a bug ? > > But N-way Multi-master seams to be working correctly when using > "refreshAndPersist". I see some reasons why using "refreshOnly" instead of > "refreshAndPersist", will this be corrected in the next release of OpenLDAP ? > > What is recommended with OpenLDAP 2.4.11. Should we wait for the next stable > release if we intend to use N-way Multi-master in production ?
I would wait for 2.4.14. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E [email protected] Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ Suretec Systems is a limited company registered in Scotland. Registered number: SC258005. Registered office: 13 Whiteley Well Place, Inverurie, Aberdeenshire, AB51 4FP. Subject to disclaimer at http://www.suretecgroup.com/disclaimer.html
