[email protected] wrote: >> [email protected] wrote: >>> On Feb 7, 2009, at 9:21 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>> Sorry for the out-of-sequence reply. I'll test and let you know >>>>> what I >>>>> find. >>>> No problem. Note that if this is the cause of this issue, and, in >>>> any >>>> case, if you have some "range" attributes in your response, you >>>> still >>>> have an issue with those values. >>> Yes. I'm not sure what to do about them in the medium term. Not >>> having slapd crash is a good first step, though :P >> Are you confirming that the original issue is fixed? > > Unfortunately not. The morning I tested the fix you checked into HEAD > and still got an assertion error in pcache at the same point when > caching group objects that contain range specifiers. I have core files > and would be happy to provide additional information if you need it.
As I wrote, I only simulated receiving that type of response by modifying the name of the attribute after it was extracted by back-meta and before it was resolved. It would be interesting to see what happens when the actual response of AD is received by back-meta. In any case, since you have the core files, it would be interesting to see the attribute structure, and specifically of the a_desc member (the AttributeDescription structure). p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: [email protected] -----------------------------------
