> Right, I did the same first with test017. I've now repeated with
> test018, 
> which works fine since the intermediate message carries the sync
> cookie.

Ah, I never checked refreshOnly, as it's not an option I use often.  Well, the 
issue about response controls needs to be solved at some point.  In any case, 
proxying syncrepl this way should not be regular usage.  I'm happy it helped 
sorting out some issues in the proxies.

Fine for the liblber patch to be backed out, then.  I can't test right now, but 
I don't see any reason to have a different behavior than yours.  What puzzles 
me now is that I had to rework entry parsing in back-meta to prevent it eating 
entry controls while parsing attributes, but back-ldap didn't need anything 
like that...

p.


Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
-----------------------------------
Office:  +39 02 23998309
Mobile:  +39 333 4963172
Fax:     +39 0382 476497
Email:   [email protected]
-----------------------------------


Reply via email to