[email protected] wrote: > For programs that produce real output (slapcat, ldapsearch) this might > be true, but for those that don't (slapadd, slapd) I totally disagree. > Stderr is for errors, not chatty progress or debug messages. I always > hate it when the error messages gets burried in lots of noice. > > My preference is to have progress and debug messages on stdout, enabled > by options or at least possible to disable by options. Real output must > be possible to send to a file specified as argument, to separate it from > the progress and debug noice. Stderr is for error messages, and > possibly out-of-band messages.
+1 Ciao, Michael.
