[email protected] wrote: > Full_Name: Rein Tollevik > Version: CVS HEAD/RE_24 > OS: Irrelevant > URL: > Submission from: (NULL) (81.93.160.250) > > > I had a couple of seg. faults when resync'ing my servers after upgrading to > the > upcoming 2.4.16 release. Looks as if a copy of the backend must be used when > testing the filter in syncprov_matchops. See the gdb output at the end. > Note, > some function names are incorrect due to optimization. A fix is coming.
The fix makes no sense, or the problem has not yet been analyzed sufficiently. Nobody in that call chain should be zeroing out bd_info. And if someone *is*, then it will happen in *whatever* BackendDB structure is currently being used. Explain the real cause of the problem, and why the fix is correct. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
