[email protected] wrote: >> http://purgatory.spnet.net/~karavelov/faillog >> > > There is no corruption. What happens is that back-bdb, when returning the > entry from the cache, correctly locates it based on the indexed attrs used > in the filter, but at some point decides that the entry is outside the > scope of your search: >
I think it is corruption because when such a fail appears it is not cleaned by slapd restart - after starting it continues to give wrong answers. The fail cleans after deleting the cache between slapd stop and start. Luben
