[email protected] wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> So it seems the relevance of this schema to anything in use today is >> about nil. > >> If you can find any current, active organizations with a currently maintained >> spec for this schema, we can certainly update it. Otherwise, seems like we >> should drop it. > > There is still an archive of the NADF documents here > http://stats.dante.org.uk/nameflow/ds/nadf.html > > but again, the very difficulty in locating them tends to indicate that > they're > not in common use...
I'd have no objections against removing that file from OpenLDAP's source distribution. I was just testing including as many schema files as possible and checking dependencies (for interop testing with web2ldap). Ciao, Michael.
