--------------000706010609000308080803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[email protected] wrote: > Fixed in HEAD; please test. Thanks, p. The patch works, however gcc with "-Wall -pedantic" complains that according to C standards, behaviour of line like this is undefined. For maximum portability, it is probably best to increment "i" individually instead, as seen in the attached patch. I apologise for the inconvenience of patching a tiny bug like this in two stages. Ondrej Kuznik This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. --------------000706010609000308080803 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="fix.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="fix.diff" Content-Description: fix.diff Index: openldap-2.4.20/servers/slapd/overlays/translucent.c =================================================================== --- openldap-2.4.20.orig/servers/slapd/overlays/translucent.c 2010-03-25 14:38:21.000000000 +0100 +++ openldap-2.4.20/servers/slapd/overlays/translucent.c 2010-03-25 14:38:38.000000000 +0100 @@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ i = c->valx; ch_free( (*an)[i].an_name.bv_val ); do { - (*an)[i] = (*an)[++i]; + (*an)[i] = (*an)[i+1]; + i++; } while ( !BER_BVISNULL( &(*an)[i].an_name )); } return 0; --------------000706010609000308080803--
