[email protected] wrote: > On 03/22/2011 08:31 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> Am Dienstag 22 M=E4rz 2011, 11:39:33 schrieb [email protected]: >>> [email protected] wrote: >>>> Ralf Haferkamp wrote: >>>>> I changed the state back to "Open" as the problem is not really >>>>> solved yet. I wonder if we should revert the original fix to >>>>> liblutil/Makefile.in for now to have at least a working built back >>>>> on non-Windows Platforms. >>>> =20 >>>> Revert is fine to get HEAD building cleanly for now. Seems like the >>>> best solution longterm is to move libldif into its own directory >>>> since the rest of liblutil doesn't depend on it. >>> =20 >>> And as yet another option, why not build it alongside libldap... >> Shouldn't we just integrate it with libldap? AFAICS libldif uses stuff=20 >> from libldap (ldap_pvt_hex_unescape) anyways and libldap (ldifutil.c)=20 >> needs libldif.
Yeah, that makes the most sense. I've just moved it over for now, the code is untouched so the names are still ldif_* (as opposed to ldap_ldif_*). I don't see any good reason to change the names. >> I am bit confused about how this was supposed to work orginally (libldif=20 >> as a standalone library). > I don't know if openldap ever had a truly standalone libldif. It's fine > with me if the ldif functionality is provided by libldap. Sounds good. HEAD now builds cleanly. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
