On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: > Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a >>> patch for >>> ITS#7168. >> >> This works for me: >> >> slapd.ldif: >> ... >> dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config >> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig >> objectClass: olcConstraintConfig >> olcOverlay: constraint >> olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 >> olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 >> ... > > From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint. > > Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or > URL-based constraints. > > The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-constraint > quite heavily. > > Ciao, Michael. >
I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me. Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the patch. Thank you. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
