Thanks guys - I think we will look at going to MDB as well now. On 4/09/2012, at 8:42 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Monday, September 03, 2012 6:35 PM +0000 [email protected] wrote: > >> Nikolai Schupbach wrote: >>> Hi Howard, >>> >>> Thank you very much for the explanation. What BDB version would you >> recommend. Obviously I have quite a few options and would like to use a >> version that is known to be very solid. >> >> I believe 4.7.25 + all 4 of its official patches was pretty stable. >> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/products/berkeleydb/patch-088170.html >> >> I've done limited testing with 4.8.30, 5.1.19, and 5.3.21. At this point >> I'm no longer tracking BDB revisions since MDB has superior performance >> while using 1/4 as much RAM and requiring no tuning. > > We've been using BDB 4.7.25+all 4 patches without issue for several years as > well. However, I will also note that we are now switching over to MDB as > well for our production services starting with OpenLDAP 2.4.32. > > --Quanah > > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Sr. Member of Technical Staff > Zimbra, Inc > A Division of VMware, Inc. > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
